Reconceptualizing Leadership Resilience in Complex Adaptive Management Systems: A Qualitative Inquiry
Keywords:
leadership resilience, complex adaptive systems, adaptive leadership, management systems, qualitative inquiry, organizational resilience, Tehran, thematic analysisAbstract
This study aimed to reconceptualize leadership resilience as an adaptive, relational, and system-level capability within complex adaptive management systems. This qualitative inquiry was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 24 senior and middle-level managers working in technology-intensive, service, manufacturing, financial, and public-sector organizations in Tehran, Iran. Participants were selected through purposive sampling based on managerial experience, exposure to organizational disruption, and direct involvement in strategic decision-making under uncertainty. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was reached after the twenty-second interview, with two additional interviews conducted to confirm saturation. Interviews lasted between 45 and 75 minutes and focused on managers’ experiences of uncertainty, disruption, adaptive decision-making, team coordination, and resilience-building practices. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis supported by NVivo software. Coding proceeded through open coding, axial categorization, and theme development. Credibility was enhanced through member checking, peer review, code comparison, and maintenance of an audit trail. The analysis generated four main categories: adaptive sensemaking under uncertainty, distributed resilience through relational coordination, balancing control and emergence, and learning-based renewal after disruption. The findings showed that leadership resilience was not perceived merely as individual endurance or psychological toughness. Instead, participants described it as a dynamic capability through which leaders interpret weak signals, sustain collective confidence, mobilize cross-functional networks, tolerate temporary ambiguity, and transform disruption into organizational learning. Interview narratives indicated that resilient leadership emerged most strongly when formal authority was combined with participatory interpretation, rapid experimentation, and flexible coordination. The study concludes that leadership resilience in complex adaptive management systems should be understood as a multi-level adaptive process rather than a fixed leader trait. Resilient leaders do not simply absorb pressure; they create conditions through which organizational actors can make sense of uncertainty, coordinate distributed responses, and regenerate strategic capacity after disruption.
References
Arena, M. J., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2016). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting from human capital to social capital. People & Strategy, 39(2), 22–27.
Bhamra, R., Dani, S., & Burnard, K. (2011). Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5375–5393. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.563826
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13, 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.07.001
Lichtenstein, B. B., Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., Seers, A., Orton, J. D., & Schreiber, C. (2006). Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(4), 2–12.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Plowman, D. A., Baker, L. T., Beck, T. E., Kulkarni, M., Solansky, S. T., & Travis, D. V. (2007). Radical change accidentally: The emergence and amplification of small change. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 515–543. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525647
Schneider, M., & Somers, M. (2006). Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of complexity theory for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.006
Sutcliffe, K. M., & Vogus, T. J. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 94–110). Berrett-Koehler.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z
Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.009
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2017). Organizational response to adversity: Fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 733–769. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0134