From Hierarchies to Ecosystems: Developing a Theory of Leadership Transformation in Decentralized Organizations
Keywords:
Decentralized organizations, leadership transformation, ecosystem leadership, shared leadership, complexity leadership, qualitative research, grounded theory, organizational changeAbstract
The objective of this study was to develop a qualitative theory explaining how leadership is transformed when organizations move from hierarchical control structures toward decentralized, ecosystem-based forms of coordination. This qualitative study used an inductive grounded theory design based on semi-structured interviews with 27 participants working in decentralized, project-based, digital, and knowledge-intensive organizations in Tehran. Participants included founders, senior managers, team leaders, organizational development consultants, and professionals involved in self-managed teams, agile structures, platform-based collaboration, or networked organizational arrangements. Participants were selected through purposive and theoretical sampling, and data collection continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Interviews were conducted face-to-face or online, lasted between 45 and 90 minutes, and focused on experiences of leadership, decision-making, authority distribution, coordination, conflict, accountability, and adaptation in decentralized organizational contexts. Data were analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding with the support of NVivo software. The analysis produced four main categories: redistribution of authority, leadership as relational coordination, ecosystemic accountability, and adaptive sensemaking. The findings showed that leadership transformation in decentralized organizations does not mean the disappearance of leadership; rather, it indicates a shift from person-centered command to distributed influence, from positional authority to negotiated legitimacy, and from vertical supervision to horizontal coordination. Participants described leadership as an emergent process embedded in teams, digital platforms, interdependent projects, professional communities, and cross-functional networks. The resulting theoretical model suggests that decentralized organizations require a form of ecosystem leadership in which direction, alignment, commitment, learning, and accountability are produced through shared norms, transparent information flows, role fluidity, and continuous collective interpretation. The study concludes that leadership transformation in decentralized organizations is best understood as a transition from hierarchical leadership to ecosystemic leadership. In this model, leaders act less as controllers and more as architects of conditions, connectors of capabilities, guardians of purpose, and facilitators of adaptive coordination. The proposed theory contributes to leadership studies by integrating insights from shared leadership, complexity leadership, plural leadership, and ecosystem strategy into a qualitative model of leadership transformation in decentralized organizational settings.
References
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. Tavistock.
Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217–1234. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.20159921
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
Denis, J. L., Langley, A., & Sergi, V. (2012). Leadership in the plural. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 211–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.667612
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press.
Lee, M. Y., & Edmondson, A. C. (2017). Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.002
Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641
Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (Eds.). (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Sage.
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
Puranam, P., Alexy, O., & Reitzig, M. (2014). What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Academy of Management Review, 39(2), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0436
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization {A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.}. Free Press.
